Highly effective in controlling bacteria

Colgate Total®with Dual-Zinc + Arginine enables superior biofilm control.*,1,2 An in-vitro study showed that Colgate Total® is highly effective in controlling bacteria across the whole mouth and in saliva. Clinical findings revealed reductions up to 41% higher than those obtained through brushing with a regular fluoride toothpaste alone.4 

Superior clinical outcomes#,*

Furthermore, superior# clinical outcomes were confirmed in numerous clinical studies,5-7 demonstrating significantly better control of plaque, gum problems,tartar and malodour, compared to a standard non-antibacterial sodium fluoride toothpaste. 

Plaque reduction - 34.4%5,^ 

Malodour reduction - 30.8%7,^

● Reduction in gum problems - 26.6%5,^ 

● Reduction in tartar - 40.1%6,^

Colgate Total® is the advanced way to achieve Whole Mouth Health by proactively controlling and protecting against bacteria on 100% of mouth surfaces, Teeth, Tongue, Cheeks and Gums.†† 

Empower every one of your patients by recommending Colgate Total® so that they can achieve superior biofilm control1,2,††​ for better, more complete oral health. 

Click here for further information on how you can achieve effective biofilm management with Colgate Total®

ENDS 

 

* Colgate Total® provides superior in-vitro delivery, penetration, and retention of Zinc through Arginine technology for biomass reductions vs Zinc control toothpaste. 

† Mass spectrometry images of salivary 10-day biofilms treated once with toothpaste slurry and regrown overnight under constant artificial salivary flow (10 mL/hr). 

‡ Confocal images of established salivary 40-hour biofilms grown in-vitro under flow and then treated once for 2 minutes with water control (top) or Dual-Zinc + Arginine technology (bottom). 

§ Bacterial biofilms imaged after one treatment with either non-antibacterial fluoride toothpaste or Dual Zinc + Arginine toothpaste slurry followed by a 12-hour regrowth period. 

# Compared with non-bacterial sodium fluoride toothpaste. 

^ Statistically significant reduction vs non-antibacterial fluoride toothpaste. 

†† vs ordinary non-anti-bacterial fluoride toothpaste. 

References:

1. Manus L, et al. J Clin Dent 2018;29(Spec Iss A)A10–19. 2. Daep C, et al. August 2019, data on file. 3. Sanz et al, J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(Suppl 18):S5–S11. 4. Prasad K et al, J 

Clin Dent 2018;29 (Spec Iss A). 5. Li X, et al. J Dent Res 2019;98 (Sepc Iss A):3444. 6. Seriwatanachai & Mateo, Sept 2016, data on file. 7. Hu D, et al. J Clin Dent 2018;29 (Spec Iss A) A41-45.